METHODS AND INITIAL FINDINGS FROM THE DURHAM DIABETES COALITION: INTEGRATING GEOSPATIAL HEALTH TECHNOLOGY AND COMMUNITY INTERVENTIONS TO REDUCE DEATH AND DISABILITY

Methods and initial findings from the Durham Diabetes Coalition: Integrating geospatial health technology and community interventions to reduce death and disability

Methods and initial findings from the Durham Diabetes Coalition: Integrating geospatial health technology and community interventions to reduce death and disability

Blog Article

Objective: The Durham Diabetes Coalition (DDC) was established in response to escalating rates of disability and death related to type 2 diabetes mellitus, particularly among racial/ethnic minorities and persons of low socioeconomic status in Durham County, North Carolina.We describe a community-based demonstration project, informed by a geographic health information system (GHIS), that aims to improve health and healthcare delivery for Durham County residents with diabetes.Materials and Methods: A prospective, population-based study is assessing a community intervention airpods in jacksonville that leverages a GHIS to inform community-based diabetes care programs.The GHIS integrates clinical, social, and environmental data to identify, stratify by risk, and assist selection of interventions at the individual, neighborhood, and population levels.

Results: The DDC is using a multifaceted approach facilitated by GHIS to identify the specific risk profiles of patients and neighborhoods across Durham County.A total of 22,982 patients with diabetes in Durham County were identified using a computable phenotype.These patients tended to be older, female, African American, and not covered by private health insurance, compared with the 166,041 persons without diabetes.Predictive models inform decision-making to facilitate care and track outcomes.

Interventions include: 1) neighborhood interventions to improve the context of care; 2) intensive team-based care for persons in the top decile of risk for death or hospitalization within the coming year; 3) low-intensity telephone coaching to improve adherence to evidence-based treatments; 4) county-wide communication strategies; and 5) systematic quality improvement in clinical care.Conclusions: To improve health outcomes and reduce costs associated with type 2 diabetes, the DDC is matching resources with the specific needs of individuals vibrating table for chocolate and communities based on their risk characteristics.

Report this page